Rodgers’s commentary on social issues shouldn’t inspire public confidence in him as a candidate for national office.
Aaron Rodgers is an iconic NLL football player. He has won a Super Bowl ring, earned four NFL MVP awards, played in ten Pro Bowls, and received the Bart Starr and Bert Bell awards—all earned during his long career with the Green Bay Packers. Now, Rodgers is continuing his career with the New York Jets, which was delayed a year by a season-ending injury suffered in Game 1 of the 2023 season.
Courtesy People Magazine
These days, Rodgers is also considered a leading vice presidential candidate to join Robert Kennedy Jr. on this year’s U.S. presidential election ballot. We’ve had athletes elected to key positions in the past, so–at least on the face of it–there’s no reason to view this as a new story. His broad-based name recognition is one reason why.
That said, there is a reason why any reasonable person should question the possibility of Rodgers serving in the second-highest office of the land. That assertion is based on what Rodgers has said and done in the past.
For example, Rodgers refused to get vaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic, outspoken about why he was an anti-vaxxer. He also spread misinformation about the virus and said he used ivermectin, a medication used for horses, as an alternative. More recently, he has been widely criticized for the comments he made about two matters–a mass murder and a sexual exploitation case. Rodgers’s explanations about what he said in each case raise additional concerns and remind one of what a boxer does when pinned against the ropes.
We need people in office who treat public matters with respect and compassion. There is evidence that Aaron Rodgers does neither. The reckless nature of his public commentary on issues of public importance is troubling and unbecoming. Serving as vice president is a tremendous honor and responsibility.
Up your game, Aaron Rodgers. Otherwise, stick to pro football.
